Societal attitudes towards bisexuality have often been argued to be overwhelmingly associated with denial, erasure, and stigmatisation. Bisexual people are considered to be disadvantaged amongst other sexual minorities due to various complexities, such as its disruption to heteronormative ways of thinking in addition to harmful stereotypes that have come to be attributed to it over time. General bisexuality research up to this point in time have tended to focus on generalised bisexuality or have included bisexuality under the guise of LGB or LGBTQ+ etc. acronyms but without much focus on it as a separate entity. Moreover, media coverage of bisexuality sports athletes has also been found to be limited in comparison to other LGBTQ+ groups such as lesbian women and gay men in sport. This study takes the stance of a textual media analysis through which the narratives presented about bisexual people in sport were analysed and cross-examined with existing literature, in addition to theoretical lenses such as the work of Goffman and Gramsci to make sense of certain themes. A total of 44 texts were sourced from mainstream and LGBTQ+ specialist media outlets. Thematic analysis produced 5 overarching themes attributed to being bisexual in sport were identified: bisexual burden, bivisibility, mental health, intersectionality, and sporting environments. While the narratives confirmed aspects of bisexual burden already present in current literature, they offered some initial insights into various sociological structures and factors that also shape and contribute to how bisexuality may be perceived in sport, such as religion, culture, and sport-specific environments. Being openly bisexual in upper levels of sport is overwhelmingly framed as brave and a positive step in the direction of LGBTQ+ equality, however the components of bivisibility are also contested with regards to significance over talent. Finally, future areas for research have been identified to combat bierasure in sport academia.
Permanent link to this resource: https://doi.org/10.24384/x8n3-ad68
The fulltext files of this resource are currently embargoed.Embargo end: 2024-06-27
Young, Jessica
Supervisors: Jakeman, John; Whigham, Stuart
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences
Year: 2024
© Young, Jessica Published by Oxford Brookes UniversityAll rights reserved. Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.