Journal Article


Making (and un-making) meaning in Alejandro Zambra's Multiple choice

Abstract

The metafictional form of Alejandro Zambra’s text Multiple Choice explicitly presents interpretative challenges to the reader. It strategically foregrounds the inferential processes and guided choices involved in deriving and deciding upon meaning, in such a way as to lead readers to infer thematic significance from this salience. Without intending text, he is nonetheless directly and deeply engaging with precisely the interpretative principles and processes which relevance theory attempts to account for and explicate. This article therefore uses relevance theory to analyse in depth how Zambra’s multiple choice questions can be made meaningful within the context of a work of fiction, in the hope that it can offer insights into the potential inferential processes of readers, the ways in which to suggest that Zambra is in any way consciously engaging with relevance theory in this they are guided by the workings of this text, and how they lead towards broader thematic interpretations. Additionally, this article reflects on the significance of second-person address and disnarration to the pragmatic processes which Zambra meaningfully exploits, foregrounds and subverts.   

Attached files

Authors

Macrae, Andrea

Oxford Brookes departments

Department of English and Modern Languages

Dates

Year of publication: 2022
Date of RADAR deposit: 2022-02-07


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License


Related resources

This RADAR resource is Identical to Making (and un-making) meaning in Alejandro Zambra's Multiple choice

Details

  • Owner: Joseph Ripp
  • Collection: Outputs
  • Version: 1 (show all)
  • Status: Live
  • Views (since Sept 2022): 253