Thesis (Ph.D)


A legal study of the right to life in the European Convention on Human Rights and Islam

Abstract

The right to Ii fe is provided by the European Convention n Human rights. The Convention has also offered provisions of how this right must be protected. This has entailed - at stages in a gradual move - the abolishment of the death penalty. Next to the death penalty, abortion, euthanasia and death occurring as a result of the excessive use of force are predominantly the main right to life issues. The European Court of Human rights by offering opinions and judgments encompassing its interpretations on these issues has generated the Conventionbased jurisprudence ofthe right to life. On the other hand this is a human rights regional system that is obliged to consider other legal systems because of the influence of those systems both inside its jurisdiction and outside it. Islamic law or Shariah is a major legal system that commands a great deal of respect and compliance in and around the geographical territories of the Council of Europe and thus the Convention. Shariah is a legal system based on religion. It offers a comprehensive code of law to include criminal, family and commercial laws. Shariah - inter alia - contains laws with life and right to life as their concern. These laws are sporadically spread and to be found in areas such criminal law and family law as well the Islamic international law. Shariah differs from the Convention in many ways. These differ in their historical origination, development and operational modes as well as their philosophy and also details oflaw. They also differ in their level of attachment to jurisprudential dogmas as a direct result of one being a pure religious law and other being a secular law with the centricity of human mind. Whereas the death penalty is abolished by the Convention, it is theologically endorsed and upheld by Shariah. Intermittent discussions of abolishment in Shariah are chiefly focused on moderating the enforcement and not the divine law. However in many areas including aspects of protection against the excessive use of force as well as beginning and end of life issues the contrast is not as sharp and similarities could be discerned. Likewise it can be established that areas in legal philosophy in both systems may bear resemblances both as concepts and their legal results; notions such as "the margin of appreciation" in the Convention's jurisprudence and' Urfin Shariah's principles of legal interpretation.

DOI (Digital Object Identifier)

Permanent link to this resource: https://doi.org/10.24384/yt2c-jn63



Access to the files of this resource is restricted.
Information about access: Access restricted at the request of the author

Authors

Gohari, Mohammad J.

Oxford Brookes departments

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
School of Law

Dates

Year: 2010


© Gohari, Mohammad J.
Published by Oxford Brookes University
All rights reserved. Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Details

  • Owner: Unknown user
  • Collection: eTheses
  • Version: 1 (show all)
  • Status: Live
  • Views (since Sept 2022): 257