It has been said that evaluating coaching/mentoring interventions is notoriously difficult (Klasen & Clutterbuck, 2002). In addition, evaluation in the pastoral ministry is difficult where objective outcomes are problematic to identify. Arguably the desirable outcomes are growth, development and self-efficacy of the pastor. Formative evaluation asks: does the coaching/mentoring environment provide conditions that promote or hinder growth and development? This data is best provided by subjective self-reporting of recipients. A Q-sort was devised to assess subjective experiences and impact of coaching/mentoring environments. The factor analysis identified three coaching/mentoring environments. Q Methodology is demonstrated to be a useful evaluation tool.
evaluation, coaching, mentoring, pastoral ministry, Q methodology
© the Author(s)
Published by Oxford Brookes University
RADAR: Research Archive and Digital Asset RepositoryAbout RADAR