Deseré Kokt ✉ (Central University of Technology, South Africa) Tom Dreyer ✉ (Central University of Technology, South Africa)
In the fiercely competitive international business environment organisations need to actively engage in attracting, recruiting, and retaining top talent. Mentoring as a key part of talent management is pertinent, especially in the context of multinational corporations that employ diverse employees from across the globe. The study utilised a mixed-methods approach, commencing with a pre-assessment of mentors’ competencies and psychological mindsets which informed the design of a mentor development journey. The latter was applied as an intervention to prepare mentors to provide engaged mentoring within a selected organisation. Findings show that the mentor development journey enhanced the competencies and psychological mindsets of mentors.
mentoring, mentor development journey, mentor competencies, psychological mindsets
Accepted for publication: 11 January 2024 Published online: 01 February 2024
© the Author(s) Published by Oxford Brookes University
Mentoring and the implementation of mentoring plans constitutes a major activity, especially for large multinational corporations. The prevalence of failed mentoring programmes, including in multinational corporations, is well documented (see Mendenhall, Oddou & Mendenhall, 2017; Tung, 2011; Zhuanga, Wu & Wen, 2013). The high failure rate of mentoring programmes often results in strained mentor–mentee relationships that not only ruin work relationships, but also waste valuable time, resources, and money (Goldgrab, 2019; Robinson, 2014; Straus, Johnson, Marquez & Feldman, 2013). It is thus imperative that mentoring be a well-planned and coordinated effort.
Mentoring programmes need to be in place before mentors are appointed (Gandhi & Johnson, 2016). Like anyone stepping into a new role, mentors are more likely to succeed if they participate in a constructive mentor development programme prior to becoming mentors. According to Erickson, Noonan, Brussow and Carter (2017), mentors require specific competencies that enable them to build healthy relationships with mentees. These include effective communication, active listening, rapport building, gaining of trust, goal setting, and the ability to give constructive feedback and to influence others (Wilson, 2012). Such competencies need to be supported by a positive psychological mindset which includes displaying positive emotions, building positive relationships, and caring for the overall wellness of mentees.
Previous research (see Brashear, Bellenger & Boles, 2006; Sange & Srivastava, 2012) confirms that mentoring boosts the confidence of mentees and enhances positive emotions, motivation, and organisational commitment. Moreover, it lowers not only employee turnover intention, but also actual employee turnover. In a study on United States Army officers, findings showed that positive mentoring relationships reduced the likelihood of turnover by up to 38% (Payne & Huffman, 2005). Allen, Eby, Poteet, Lentz and Lima (2004) further found that mentored employees earned better remuneration and were more frequently promoted compared to employees who were not mentored. With regard to multinational corporations Chen and Vogel (2016) found that mentoring improves tacit knowledge transfer in these corporations. Md Yusoff, Kassim and Seenivasa (2011) reported that the absence of mentoring in multinational corporations was a stumbling block to the development of female managers in India. Research on mentoring within multinational corporations is scant. Thus, the value of this study lies in its contribution towards the limited body of research.
The current study was based on a single multinational corporation that employs around 45 000 employees from 119 countries. The company depends on the competencies of both expatriates and local talent; in other words, it has a culturally diverse workforce. In the past, this corporation experienced a plethora of failed mentoring programmes which resulted in failed assignments, increased staff turnover and, ultimately, a loss of revenue. After an internal investigation, management found that most of the challenges were related to interpersonal relationships and communication challenges between the mentors and mentees.
Extant literature reveals similar challenges, emphasising discordant relationships between mentors and mentees as a major stumbling block (Garringer, 2006). In addressing this problem, the study used an intervention-based approach to gauge and develop the competencies and psychological mindsets of mentors. First, a literature review was done followed by a pre-assessment of mentors. The findings were then used to design a mentor development journey. After the three-month intervention, mentors were assessed again. The results enabled the researchers to offer pertinent recommendations for mentoring in the context of a multinational corporation.
The literature review discusses the meaning and importance of mentor competencies and psychological mindsets in supporting positive organisational relationships and development. As the researchers advocate positive organisational relationships, especially related to mentor–mentee relationships, the PERMA model of Seligman (2002) served as theoretical framework for the study. This will be explained below.
Armstrong (2010) explains ‘mentorship’ as helping employees to learn and enhance their understanding of their jobs including the required competencies they need. Wong and Premkumar (2007) argue that mentorship is a learning process where beneficial, mutual, personal, and reciprocal relationships are established. The term ‘mentor’ is generally used to refer to a person who has broad and profound knowledge; hence they can teach and guide the inexperienced to gain the desired workplace knowledge and competencies (Thompson, 2019; Zhuanga et al., 2013). In general, mentors provide mentees with access to information, resources and opportunities, as well as career support and reaching job objectives (Bouquillon, Sosik & Lee, 2005; Werner & DeSimone, 2012).
The roles of a mentor are shaped by the type, focus, and structure of the mentoring relationship. A mentor can follow multiple approaches in a single mentoring relationship; hence the need for mentors and mentees to collectively decide on the nature of their engagements. This can include both formal and informal mentoring. Formal mentoring is usually driven by organisational processes with specified objectives and outcomes. On the other hand, informal mentoring is more flexible and unstructured, which can involve organisational learning by means of networking with colleagues. Mentoring should continuously foster positive relationships, respect, and trust between mentors and mentees (El Din, 2011; Page, 2015).
The following mentor competencies were explored in this study: self and behavioural awareness, business and professional understanding, communication, commitment to own learning, helping others to learn, relationship management, goal clarity, active listening, rapport building, gaining trust, setting goals, and providing constructive feedback. These competencies were identified in the research of Berk, Berg, Mortimer, Walton-Moss and Yeo (2005) and Fleming, House, Hanson, Yu, Garbutt, McGee, Kroenke, Abedin and Rubio (2013).
Because this study supported the development and advancement of positive and collegial relationships in organisations, there was a pertinent focus on the psychological mindsets of mentors. The notion of positive psychological mindsets hails from the field of psychology (which aims to identify, understand, forecast, and change/control human behaviour) and particularly positive psychology, which is the study of human ideas, feelings, and behaviour based on individual strengths rather than flaws (Seligman, 2002).
Positive psychology aims to identify the strengths and unique talents of individuals (in this study, mentors) by shifting focus towards increasing positive emotions and self-confidence, and enhancing goal setting and achieving targets (Aditomo, 2015; Avais, Wassan, Chandio & Shaikh, 2014; Khan, 2021; Lawson, 2016).
According to Gunderson, Gripshover, Romero, Dweck, Goldin-Meadow and Levine (2013), psychological mindsets are formed in the formative or childhood stages of individual development. This occurs mostly by means of praising (expressing admiration or approval) and labelling (or describing) a person. For instance, when children are praised and labelled ‘smart’, the message they receive instils a mentality that they have an ability to perform a task or reach an objective. On the other hand, a lack of praise and negative labelling can have the opposite effect (Cherry, 2020; Dweck, 1999; Gunderson et al., 2013).
Apart from positive psychology, three other fields of psychology contribute to the conception of the mentoring process, namely cognitive psychology (which seeks to understand how people perceive, learn, remember, and think about occurrences); organisational and industrial psychology (which considers the influence of the physical environment and organisational culture on individual behaviour); and educational psychology (which seeks to understand how individuals comprehend, learn, and retain new information) (Neisser, 2003; Weathington, Bergman & Bergman, 2014).
There is a strong relationship between cognitive psychology and mentoring as the mentor attempts to understand how mentees acquire, store, process, and use new and existing information (Akbari, Behzadpoor & Dadvand, 2010). Related to industrial and organisational psychology, the mentor seeks to develop mentees that function effectively in the organisational context (Cable & O’Driscoll, 2010). Educational psychology relates to mentee learning and the acquisition of competencies and acceptable behaviours that enable them to fit in as part of the organisation. This, in turn, engenders cognitive processes like comprehension, learning, and memory (Mukundan & Kalajahi, 2013; Schoeman, 2018).
Positive psychology underpins the PERMA model and therefore emphasises the development of positive relationships that can enrich a mentor’s life and work interactions (Ackerman, 2018). The PERMA model has five components that apply directly to effective mentoring: positive emotion, engagement, relationships, meaning, and accomplishments (Lopez, Pedrotti & Snyder, 2014; Seligman, 2010).
Positive emotions relate to individual emotions such as joy, gratitude, and love. Engagement encapsulates the extent to which individuals are immersed in their work and the pleasure they derive from their jobs and life in general (Butler & Kern, 2016; Stuart & Jose, 2014). Being engaged requires cognition, thought, and emotion at an individual level (Stuart & Jose, 2014). Because positive experiences are related to one’s interaction with other people, relationships are a crucial component. Maintaining positive relationships can contribute to employees’ feeling less lonely and more happy, which, in turn, impacts positively on their wellbeing (Chopik & O’Brien, 2017; Statistics New Zealand, 2015).
Good relationships and social connection among employees enhance self-esteem and community, which, again, increases a sense of meaning. Meaning relates to a sense of worth that individuals derive from relationships, creativity, generosity, etc. Relationships can thus enhance meaning and a sense of community with others in the workplace. In many cases, the workplace has become the substitute for the traditional family or communal units from which many modern employees have become alienated (Butler & Kern, 2016; Goodman, Disabato, Kashdan & Kauffman, 2017). Accomplishments refer to the desire to achieve or accomplish a goal for its own ends, which can contribute to engagement and meaning (Seligman, 2018).
The philosophical stance of the study adhered to critical realism as the researchers believe that both absolute truths and people’s subjective opinions are valid ways of looking at reality (Saunders, Lewis & Thornhill, 2007). The study was also directed at solving a real-world problem, namely, to develop mentor–mentee relationships in a multinational corporation (Morgan, 2014). The study applied a mixed-methods approach and a case study design as it was focused on a single multinational corporation (Creswell & Poth, 2018).
The target population for this study was 15 mentors which constituted the mentoring team of the corporation. The demographic composition of the respondents is displayed in table 1 below.
Most participants were males, and the majority were between 31 and 40 years of age. Most participants were from middle management and the majority had a tenure of between six and 10 years. Forty-seven per cent (47%) of participants had mentoring experience of between four and six years. Twenty per cent (20%) of participants had a PhD qualification.
Source: Authors’ own construction
The study was conducted in three phases. In phase 1 respondents were requested to complete a questionnaire, and in-depth interviews were conducted to ascertain their competencies and psychological mindsets. This was the pre-test phase. The literature study and the pre-test informed the design of the mentor development journey (phase 2). After the three-month mentor development journey was completed, respondents were requested to again complete the questionnaire followed by another structured in-depth interview (phase 3) to ascertain the developments/outcomes that flowed from the mentor development journey.
After obtaining permission from the multinational corporation to conduct the study, participants were contacted individually to secure their participation in the study. The anonymity and confidentiality of respondents’ identity and data were confirmed and clearly communicated in writing before the commencement of the study. Participants were also informed that their participation was voluntary.
The mixed-methods data gathering was conducted in two phases: the quantitative phase involved the completion of a questionnaire (pre- and post-intervention), and the qualitative phase involved in-depth interviews with respondents (pre- and post-intervention). Both phases are detailed below.
A questionnaire was used to allow mentors to reflect on their own competencies and psychological mindsets (Brown & Harris, 2013; Panadero, Brown & Courtney, 2014; Tan, 2013). The questionnaire was informed by the PERMA model of Seligman (2002) and the research of Berk et al. (2005) and Fleming et al. (2013). The questionnaire was administered using Microsoft Forms and respondents received a link to complete the questionnaire online.
For the qualitative part of the study, in-depth interviews captured the thoughts, feelings, and beliefs of participants. Face-to-face interviews were conducted at the company’s headquarters in Abu Dhabi. As this was during the Covid-19 period all safety protocols were adhered to (e.g., negative Covid-19 results, wearing of masks, sanitising, and social distancing). Owing to the stringent security policies of the corporation, the main researcher was not allowed to record the interviews. Instead, comprehensive notes were taken during the interviews and read back to respondents to ensure their accuracy.
The quantitative data were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test which compared the pre- and post- mentor development scores for mentor competencies and psychological mindsets.
Regarding the qualitative data analysis, Saunders et al. (2007) state that there is no standardised approach to present qualitative findings. Qualitative researchers use inductive reasoning, make observations, and then draw inferences about larger and more general phenomena. For this investigation a thematic content analysis was conducted to gain an in-depth understanding of the collected interview responses (Kim & Kuljis, 2010; Mayring, 2000). The following themes emanated from the responses: 1) competencies of effective mentors, 2) the ability to form positive relationships and display positive emotions, and 3) the ability to accomplish mentoring goals. Focusing on these themes allowed the researchers to make sense of collective or shared meanings and experiences of mentors.
The section below details both the quantitative and qualitative results, as well as the design of the mentor development journey.
As a large percentage of items deviated from normality, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare the pre- and post-intervention scores (Laerd Statistics, 2018; 2019). Cronbach’s alpha scores were 0.931 and 0.698 for the mentor competency and psychological mindsets sections respectively, which indicate acceptable reliability.
The pre- and post- mentor development scores are presented in tables 2 and 3 below.
*Indicates no statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-intervention scores
Table 2 indicates that the mentor development journey had a positive impact on all mentor competencies, except for two items: Question 2.8 ‘I can stimulate creativity in mentees’ (0.096) and question 2.13 ‘I effectively support mentees to bridge developmental gaps’ (0.088).
Table 3 shows that the mentor development journey had a positive impact on all psychological mindsets of mentors except for one: Question 3.3 ‘I understand inter-cultural differences and associated challenges in a multinational setting’ (0.480).
The qualitative findings revealed that the major factor related to the low level of mentor competencies recorded in the pre-test (table 2) was a lack of training and development opportunities. The mentors strongly felt that they needed training opportunities to improve their mentor competencies. This notion is supported by Azman and Jui (2014) who noted that communication, support, and mentee performance are closely connected to an effective mentoring programme. Furthermore, empathic listening is critical in mentoring relationships, acting as incentive for mentees to participate in the programme (Rodriguez, Dolan & Brady, 2018). According to Rodriguez, et al. (2018), empathy is crucial as it supports the processes that sustain the mentoring relationship over time, such as friendship and reciprocal understanding.
Another factor raised by mentors involved their tenure at the organisation. In the pre-assessment mentors who have been working for the company for less than five years displayed the lowest mentor competencies. They indicated the lack of mentor development programmes as the major cause. This finding supports the need for continuous mentor development and the need for structured mentoring programmes (Aderibigbe, Gray & Colucci-Gray, 2018; Trevethan 2017). The qualitative findings also revealed that mentors did not fully understand the concept of ‘meaning’ and how mentees can develop a sense of meaning. At its core, meaning and meaningful work enhance the motivation, effort, and productivity of employees as they adopt attitudes of ownership, responsibility, and citizenship towards their organisation, while simultaneously experiencing greater wellbeing, health, and belongingness (Rosso, Dekas & Wrzesniewski, 2010).
The literature review, as well as the findings of the pre-test, informed the design of the mentor development journey, which will be discussed in the next section.
In designing the mentor development journey, a modular blended learning approach was followed. Blended learning includes a teaching and learning process that incorporates both face-to-face teaching and Information Communication Technology (ICT) (Lalima & Dangwal, 2017). Blended learning was chosen because the ICT component assisted in minimising instructor–mentor physical contact as part of the safety measures during the Covid-19 pandemic. The blended learning approach also allowed instructors and mentors to work both online and offline; thus mentors were afforded more time to develop creative and cooperative exercises. A range of delivery methodologies were spread out across the different modules to ensure mentor engagement and to accelerate development. These included the following:
The mentor development journey included formal modular competency assessments and all modules contained a final assessment to ensure that participants understood the content. The assessment consisted of a combination of 10 explanatory and multiple-choice questions. The pass mark for each module was 80% and mentors were allowed to retake the assessment if a mark of less than 80% was obtained. Table 4 details the modules that formed part of the mentor development journey.
After the completion of the three-month mentor development journey the questionnaire was administered again, and a second round of in-depth interviews were conducted.
The findings of the post-assessment of mentors revealed that the mentor development journey improved both mentor competencies and psychological mindsets (see tables 2 and 3). For example, it enabled mentors to not only develop a sense of meaning, but also to better comprehend its importance. It also allowed mentors to better understand their roles and responsibilities, and to receive and give feedback. It encouraged mentors to be part of the company’s mentoring plan, to provide mentee support, bridge developmental gaps, stimulate creativity, and improve networking. The findings also revealed that the mentor development journey significantly improved mentors’ ability to communicate, listen empathically, set realistic goals, manage their time and apply the principles and tools required by the company (see tables 2 and 3).
From the findings, it became clear that the mentor development journey resulted in a significant improvement in mentors’ abilities to engage and communicate with mentees. Owing to the mentor development journey mentors experienced greater self-esteem and self-knowledge to accomplish their own career goals. Other competencies that improved were empathic listening, giving feedback, setting realistic goals, accomplishing goals, giving praise, displaying positive emotions, as well as building positive relationships.
Given the challenges of the post-Covid-19 world of work it is imperative for mentoring programmes to be flexible and adaptable. Mentoring needs to actively engage mentors and invest in their personal and professional development. The use of ICT is also critical for mentor development in the new world of work, as well as a combination of learning techniques like instructor-led training sessions, simulations, case studies, e-learning, role plays, and experiential learning through application.
This study provided evidence of the importance of mentoring especially in the context of a multinational corporation. Multinational corporations typically have large organisational structures. This implies more complex organisational processes and the necessity to manage pertinent issues like workforce diversity and job performance. In addition, all of this occurs amid the challenges of the new world of work, for example, increased virtualisation and digitalisation.
Professional and personal growth is central to mentor development, and organisations must commit and support mentors by allocating appropriate resources and providing targeted training and development. According to Garza, Reynosa, Werner, Duchaine and Harter (2019), mentoring programmes must deliver professional development opportunities that are tailored to the needs of the organisation, mentors, and mentees.
The following recommendations emanated from the mentor development journey proposed by this study:
The study was conducted at a single multinational corporation.
The study can be replicated in other multinational corporations.
Deseré Kokt is Professor of Human Resource Management as the Central University of Technology, Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Dr. Tom Dreyer specializes in Leadership Development and actively serves as a coach, mentor and program director with 20+ years of relevant experience.